How do bond rating agencies function? - Trading Class | Trading Courses | Webinars
  • No products in the cart.

Table of Contents
< Back to All Categories

How do bond rating agencies function?

Understanding the Functioning of Bond Rating Agencies

In the extensive world of financial markets, bond rating agencies hold an important role. They are independent bodies that assess the creditworthiness of both debt securities (bonds) and their issuers. They determine the likelihood of default of the bond issuer, which significantly impacts an investor’s decision to invest in such bonds. But, how exactly do these entities function?

Assessing Creditworthiness

The initial step in assessing bonds is understanding the term ‘creditworthiness.’ It refers to the capacity of a bond issuer, be it a corporation or a governmental body, to meet its financial obligations. A higher creditworthiness implies that defaults are less likely, alluding to a safer investment.

In the context of bond rating agencies, these entities perform an independent evaluation of the issuer’s financial health to arrive at a creditworthiness rating. Very similar to a student’s report card, which maps out the student’s academic standing, this credit rating captures the issuer’s ability to repay and honor its commitments.

The Rating Process

Essentially, the rating process begins when a bond issuer approaches a rating agency to get its bond rated. The issuer pays a rating fee to the agency to carry out this evaluation process. This process is predominantly two-stepped: quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Quantitative Analysis

Initially, the agency performs a detailed examination of the issuer’s financial statements. Numerous financial metrics are evaluated, such as profitability ratios, liquidity ratios, leverage ratios, and others. In this way, the agency gets a solid comprehension of the issuer’s financial health.

Qualitative Analysis

Following the quantitative review, the agency will carry out a qualitative analysis, concentrating on non-measurable factors that could affect the issuer’s ability to meet its obligations. These factors include the competence and expertise of the issuer’s management, the regulatory environment, market competitiveness, and more.

After this detailed analysis, the agency determines a credit rating for the bond. This rating, often represented alphabetically, such as AAA, BB, C, and so on, helps investors understand the risk associated with the bond. Bonds with higher ratings (AAA) are considered low-risk, while those with lower ratings are high-risk.

Evolving Role of Bond Rating Agencies

Bond rating agencies play a crucial role in the capital markets by providing an objective analysis of issuers’ creditworthiness. They assist in lowering information asymmetry in the bond markets, allowing investors to make informed decisions.

However, the role and function of bond rating agencies have been put under the spotlight following the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008. There were widespread criticisms that these agencies gave high ratings to mortgage-backed securities, which ended up defaulting. This has led to ongoing changes in the overall bond rating processes, involving regulatory changes, transparency enhancements, and the development of third-party due diligence.

Major Bond Rating Agencies

The leading players in this industry are Standard & Poor’s (S&P), Fitch, and Moody’s. Collectively known as the ‘Big Three’, they control nearly 95 percent of the global credit rating business. Their ratings are universally recognized and accepted as an accurate measure of an issuer’s creditworthiness.

End Note

The functionality of bond rating agencies stretches beyond merely evaluating an issuer’s creditworthiness. Its role as a market regulator, influencer of the cost of capital, and shaper of market sentiment cannot be understated. For anyone entering the bond market, understanding the functioning and role of bond rating agencies can be a meaningful starting point. Doing so not only adds to one’s financial literacy but also empowers making informed investment decisions. Keep in mind, however, that external assumptions and trends do not remove the necessity of individual investors practicing their due diligence before any investment.